Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
O R D E R
CORRECTING AWARD
Injury No.: 92-188680
Employee: Jack Dickson
Employer: ABB Combustion Engineering Services (settled)
Insurer: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (settled)
c/o Gallagher Bassett Services
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian
of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident: October 21, 1992
Place and County of Accident: Franklin County, Missouri
The Final Award Denying Compensation issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission January 28, 2000, contained a clerical error. The Commission issues its Order Correcting the Award.
The last sentence of the award reads:
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 28th day of February 2000.
That sentence is corrected to read:
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 28th day of January 2000.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 28th day of January 2000.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Christopher S. Kelly, Chairman
Christian C.R. Wrigley, Member
Matthew W. O’Neill, Member
Attest:
Secretary
Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION
(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 92-188680
Employee: Jack Dickson
Employer: ABB Combustion Engineering Services (settled)
Insurer: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (settled)
c/o Gallagher Bassett Services
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian
of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident: October 21, 1992
Place and County of Accident: Franklin County, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo Cum. Supp. 1998. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo Cum. Supp. 1998, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated October 4, 1999, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Leslie E.H. Brown, issued October 4, 1999, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 28th day of February 2000.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Christopher S. Kelly, Chairman
Christian C.R. Wrigley, Member
Matthew W. O’Neill, Member
Attest:
Secretary
AWARD
Employee: Jack Dickson Injury No. 92-188680
Dependents:
Employer: ABB Combustion Engineering (previously settled)
Additional Party: State Treasurer, as custodian of Second Injury Fund
Insurer: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh c/o Gallagher Bassett Services
Hearing Date: 5/21/99 (finally submitted 6/21/99) Checked by: LEHB/bfb
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No
2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law?
No
4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: ---
5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Franklin County, Missouri
6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease?
Yes
7. Did employer receive proper notice? ---
8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment?
No
9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? ---
10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted:
Employee was working as a boilermaker
12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death?
---
13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: alleed left hand/wrist
15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: none
16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? ---
17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? ---
18. Employee's average weekly wages: maximum
19. Weekly compensation rate: ---
COMPENSATION PAYABLE
21. Amount of compensation payable: None
Unpaid medical expenses:
weeks of temporary total disability (or temporary partial disability)
weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer
weeks of disfigurement from Employer
Permanent total disability benefits from Employer beginning , for
Claimant's lifetime
22. Second Injury Fund liability: Yes No Open
weeks of permanent partial disability from Second Injury Fund
Uninsured medical/death benefits
Permanent total disability benefits from Second Injury Fund:
weekly differential () payable by SIF for weeks beginning
and, thereafter, for Claimant's lifetime
Total: None
23. Future requirements awarded: ---
Said payments to begin --- and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.
The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of --- of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:
---
FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:
Employee: Jack Dickson Injury No: 92-188680
Dependents:
Employer: ABB Combustion Engineering (previously settled)
Additional Party State Treasurer, as custodian of Second Injury Fund
Insurer: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh c/o Gallagher Bassett Services
Checked by: LEHB/bfb
This is a hearing in Injury Number 92-188680. The claimant, Jack Dickson, appeared in person and by counsel, Robert Bedell. The Second Injury Fund appeared by and through Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Sommers. The claim against the employer/insurer was previously settled; the employer/insurer did not appear at this hearing.
The parties entered into certain stipulations and agreements as to the issues and evidence to be presented in this hearing.
STIPULATIONS:
On the date in question: a. the claimant was in the employment of ABB Combustion Engineering in Franklin County, Missouri; b. the employer and employee were operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law; c. the employer’s liability was insured by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh c/o Gallagher Bassett Services; d. the employee’s average weekly wage was at the maximum.
e. No temporary total disability benefits have been paid. f. No medical aid has been provided.
ISSUES:
1. Whether or not the claimant sustained an accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment
2. Notice
3. Medical causation
4. Nature and extent of permanent partial disability
5. Liability of the Second Injury Fund
6. Statute of Limitation
a. re: the filing of the primary claim in this case
b. re: the filing of the claim against the Second Injury Fund
EXHIBITS:
The following exhibits were admitted into evidence:
Claimant’s Exhibits:
No. A: Deposition transcript of Joseph H. Morrow, Jr., D.O. taken on behalf of the claimant on May 17, 1999 (Admitted subject to the objections therein)
No. B: Deposition transcript of James W. England, Jr. taken on behalf of the claimant on May 19, 1999 (Admitted subject to the objections therein)
No. C: Medical records of James E. Speiser, M.D.
No. D: Medical records of Paul R. Manske, M.D.
No. E: Medical records of Barnes Hospital
No. F: Medical records from St. Louis Orthopedic Institute, Inc.
No. G: Medical records from St. Joseph Hospital
No. H: Medical records of Robert J. Auclair, M.D.
No. I: Medical records of Jeffrey L. Draves, M.D.
No. J: Medical records of Donald King, M.D.
Second Injury Fund’s Exhibit’s:
Roman Numeral I: Copy of the Division’s file in Injury Number 92-188680
FINDINGS of FACTS and RULINGS of LAW
Jack Dickson, the claimant, testified that he was born on 8/14/34 and would be 65 years old in August. Present medications I am on, Dickson said, were medications for pain, water retentionand now cholesterol. Dickson testified that he has been a boilermaker since 1951. When asked if he had worked most of his years out of a union hall, Dickson answered that he had worked for a company, Boilermakers, for 18 years, then the rest of the years he had worked out of the union hall as a field boilermaker/construction journeyman. He agreed that he did similar work when he worked for the company as when he worked out of the hall. The last company I worked for was Riley Construction, Dickson said, that was a short time after I had been laid off from ABB Construction (hereinafter ABB). He agreed that he was working for ABB when he was at Union Electric at Labadie. My first job at ABB was a general foreman; I held this position for about two months, he said. I gave up the position because I had stress and went back to the duties of a boilermaker, he stated. Dickson explained that his duties as a boilermaker were erecting boiler parts – installing, fitting, tack welding. After components are in place and inspected by the inspector, they are welded out for future use of the boiler function. Dickson was asked if his work involved welding; he answered that he did more or less just tack welding. I was always in basically the fit up, alignment and so forth, he said. Dickson agreed that his work as a boilermaker was hand intensive. He explained that if you are fitting parts you either have to have both hands on a wrench or you’re holding a part while you attach or tack weld the part. At the same time you may be working off of a ladder, 30 feet in the air, so if you’re not holding something you’re holding on, he said. Dickson agreed that this was throughout the day.
Dickson testified that he began having problems with his left hand somewhere in the early 1990’s. He stated that he had agreed if Dr. Auclair’s records reflected that he saw the doctor in June of 1991. I probably had problems prior to that, Dickson stated, but not knowing what it was… He stated that he gave notice to someone at ABB that he was seeing a doctor. The treatment from Dr. Auclair was my trying out medications, such as pain and inflammation medication, to see if it helped or changed the condition I had, Dickson said. After seeing Dr. Auclair, he said, I was off work two or three weeks in June of 1991 trying to recuperate and let the soreness and swelling go out. I’m not sure about the time that I was off, Dickson stated, it could have been maybe three or four days the first time and then I went back and was off again. Dickson said that he believed he returned to work at ABB. He agreed that he continued to treat with Dr. Auclair for some time while he continued to work. Continuing to work aggravated my left wrist, Dickson agreed. It seemed like I wasn’t getting better, possibly getting worse; it took longer to recoop, he said. Dr. Auclair sent me to Missouri Baptist Hospital for a carpal tunnel check, Dickson stated. They ran tests on both hands, he said, and I had carpal tunnel really bad in my left hand and a good start in my right hand. Dr. Auclair referred me to Dr. Tucker at St. Joseph Hospital. Dickson was asked if ABB was aware he was going to Dr. Tucker for carpal tunnel surgery; he answered that they were aware, but he did not remember exactly how, whether it was through his co-workers. I don’t think I directly talked to anybody at ABB about this because at that point the job was over; I was laid off and on my own, Dickson testified. My insurance was handled through Boilermaker International, so there was no need to tell ABB about anything at that point, he said. Dickson agreed that what he was saying was that ABB was aware in 1991 that he was seeing Dr. Auclair, but he was not sure whether ABB was aware he was having surgery by Dr. Tucker. I’m sure ABB knew but I don’t remember me telling them directly, he said, but the union hall knew, my business agent knew. My co-workers knew that I had been having a problem, Dickson stated, that’s why I avoided some work. I’m sure they knew; they would call me at the house to see how I was doing, you know, after I finished my duties with them.
Dickson agreed that he first saw Dr. Tucker in January of 1993, and stated that he agreed with the doctor’s record from January of 1993 that over the past several months he had had increasing amounts of difficulty with swelling, pain and numbness in the left hand. He was asked how his left hand felt after the surgery; Dickson answered that it was very painful and very swollen, and eight days later it had to be lanced. He explained that it was infected and had what they called synovial fluids oozing out. I was instructed to return to the hospital the day after the doctor had lanced the hand for further investigation and the doctor recommended that I be admitted into the hospital that day. A second operation was performed by Dr. Tucker of opening up more area and flushing it out, he said. Dickson agreed that not long after that he had a third surgery and then a fourth surgery performed, I believe, by Dr. Tucker. He agreed that an infection specialist, Dr. King, was called in on the fourth surgery. I then went under the care of Dr. King for the diagnosis of staph infection, Dickson stated, and I had it for some time. The treatment for it was antibiotics through shot and by mouth, he said, and then I had a Clausen’s tube implanted into the main artery in my chest. I was given 56 ccs., three times a day, by a force feeding pump into my system for eight weeks along with other antibiotics and medication as well, he said. Dickson was asked if he had subsequently come under the care of a Dr. Speiser; he explained that Dr. Speiser was called in because he had been told that he possibly had some arthritis not knowing about the carpal tunnel. Dr. Speiser visited me in the hospital, Dickson said, I had lots of leakage, seeping. The doctor said that he couldn’t do anything until the leakage stops, he stated. Dickson was asked if he subsequently came under the care of orthopedic surgeon Dr. Manske; he explained that late in the care by Dr. King he showed the doctor a red spot that had showed up on his hand and Dr. King referred him to Dr. Manske. Dickson agreed that Dr. Manske performed surgery, and that this fifth and final surgery was in 1995. He stated that he has had no treatment for his left hand since the treatment with Dr. Manske in 1995 other than pain medication and antibiotics.
Dickson described the condition of his left hand. He agreed that his left hand is swollen; he explained that the tissue has deteriorated along the joint to slip down approximately a half to three quarters of an inch below alignment. I am unable to make a fist with my left hand, Dickson said. He agreed that he can only bring his fingers in approximately half way and cannot bring his thumb across his hand at all. Dickson said that he does not feel comfortable carrying objects in his left hand. He explained that it pulls then he gets a charley horse in the left forearm, and I’m afraid I’ll drop it. I practice with a plastic bag with water, he said. I hang it on my fingers just to kind of stretch and keep it active because my shoulder slumped down from carrying it so long. Dickson agreed that his shoulder was sore from carrying his hand in because of elbow pain. He was asked if he could pick up a coffee cup with his left hand; Dickson answered that weight-wise he could, but he could not trust it to hold the cup. I just had a great great granddaughter and I’m afraid to hold her, he said. Dickson stated that he does not use his left hand very much when he is eating; I have a lot of slippage, he explained. He agreed that he is right hand dominant. Dickson was asked about driving and answered that he cannot trust himself to steer the wheel. The hand rides on the wheel; I do that to try to keep alignment, he explained. When I turn, that hand goes to try to keep the stroke, Dickson testified, then it gets tired and I have to kind of nuzzle it and do one-handed driving. He was asked if he had any pain in the left hand; he answered that he did all the time. I’ve gotten used to the pain, Dickson stated, I can sleep without the pain keeping me awake. I don’t sleep well, I wake up several times a night, he said. I can sit and talk, carry on a conversation without the pain being my number one priority now where before I couldn’t, Dickson stated. He stated that he has had no subsequent injuries to the left hand.
Prior injuries before the left hand injury, Dickson stated, included a ruptured disc for which I had surgery in 1971. He agreed that this back injury occurred at work. I was off six months for this injury, Dickson stated. He was asked if he had had any problems with his back following his return to work; Dickson responded that he had to try to eliminate or not go out on the jobs where there was a lot of lifting and straining -- skull dragging work. He agreed that from 1952 to 1971 he did the skull dragging work without a problem. I had no further treatment for my back from 1971 until I re-injured it in 1986, Dickson stated. He explained that he fell 20 feet and re-injured his back. I was numb, Dickson testified. My ankles and feet and legs also took quite a beating and my back was numb, he stated, I couldn’t feel anything. At the emergency room I requested to be referred back to Dr. Weber who had performed my surgery in 1971, he said. X-rays were taken and there were no broken bones, and an MRI showed deterioration in the scar tissue area where my prior operation had been, he said. Dr. Weber recommended that it was best to leave it as it was instead of having surgery performed, and that is where it has been, Dickson said. I was off work two or three weeks for the 1986 injury and then returned to light duty, he stated. Following light duty I was generally able to do all the things that I needed to do as a boilermaker only with a different approach, Dickson stated. I really had to choose the work that I did, he said. Quite often my name would come up on the referral list for work and they would explain to me what the job involved. To be fair to everybody, I would refuse to take the job if I felt I couldn’t handle it, he said. After 1986 and before the left hand injury it happened about three times a year that I would refuse a job because I did not feel I was physically able to do it; this meant about five or six months off work, Dickson explained. He agreed that this took place up to the time he hurt his left hand. Concerning his feet and the 1986 fall, Dickson stated that it seems like the swelling never went down. And it seems like my ankles were stretched from the fall such that I had to start wearing bigger shoes. At present the ankles are stiff and tire easily. He was asked if he was comfortable walking, and he answered not really but he tries to walk for exercise. Problems with my back, Dickson stated, is that it is getting back to the pain level that I originally had. There is a lot of pressure on the sciatic nerve going down the hip around and down the back of the leg into the heel and then to the left side of the ankle. I have this pain just about all the time, he said, and I feel better using the cane for safety in case I don’t function well or slip. Using the cane also takes the pressure off my leg especially if I have to stand like at a stop light, he said. Dickson was asked what a typical day was like for him. He answered that it takes him about three hours of a morning to get started. I try to prepare some oatmeal or cereal or something, or I get dressed and go out and eat, he said. Quite often by the time I get around, the breakfast hour is over so I have to find someplace that serves breakfast until noon, he said. Being very active and very strong, Dickson testified, I loved doing my own maintenance on my house and automobiles. I liked to work with my hand, he said. I’ll still find myself buying tools I know I will never use, Dickson stated.
Dickson testified that he has a eighth grade education plus vocational schooling in areas of interest that would help him in his line of work.
On cross examination, Dickson was asked when he last worked for ABB; he answered that he did not remember the dates, but it would have been approximately three weeks before he went to work for Riley Construction. I worked for Riley, I believe, three weeks then I had to go back in for surgery, he said. Dickson explained that when he was able to maybe go back into the position that he had had at ABB, their job was complete. That’s when I went to Riley, he stated. In my last job with ABB I worked as a journeyman boilermaker installing Knox units on boilers, he said. He agreed that at this particular job he was standing and working off of a ladder all the time. Dickson agreed that he did kneeling, stooping and squatting. This job lasted about six to eight weeks, he said. I would say that I was physically able to perform my job duties as a boilermaker satisfactorily during this time, he said. I wasn’t singled out to be laid off, he stated, they laid off the whole crew that night because that was the end of it and then the day crew the next day would finish up. Dickson agreed that he worked the whole six to eight weeks until the job was finished and they laid them off. We worked eight hours a day and then started working ten hours on some portions of the job, he said. He agreed that part of his job duties included climbing ladders, lifting and using tools, lifting on a regular basis objects up to 80 pounds in weight as well as pushing and pulling these objects a lot. To get at my work I had to squat down and also lay down, Dickson said.
During cross examination Dickson described one occasion in which he was reaching through a hole and holding an 80-pound steel sheet in place until a co-worker got into position on his back in order to weld the sheet into place. I pulled my co-worker’s hood down because now he is holding the sheet with his hands and feet, Dickson said. Pulling the hood down is so he can strike an arc and tack weld the sheet, he stated. The co-worker was nervous because the pressure was on; the supervisor was not a pleasant guy, he explained. My co-worker let the steel plate slip and it fell down on my left hand and bent it back, Dickson testified. So, after that is when my pain never ceased up until the surgery, he said. Dickson agreed that this occurred towards the end of his job at ABB and that he was then off work for about three weeks and then worked for Riley for about three weeks. Subsequently, he testified that he thought he was off, had surgery, and then went to work for Riley in the tool position. After I left the ABB job I was hurting, Dickson testified. I told my foreman and I told the steward that this plate had slipped and I had hurt my hand, he stated, and they said we’ll make a record of it. The company was out; you’re laid off, Dickson testified. He stated that sheet of metal falling on his left hand happened the night they got laid off. Dickson was again asked if he was physically able to do the ABB job prior to injuring his left hand when the plate slipped; he answered yes, that was one of the reasons he was on the job, for the layout and the fit up. He was asked if he had told ABB he was going to see Dr. Auclair for a specific reason or did he just tell them he was taking time off for sick leave. Dickson responded that when they got laid off that night, ABB was through with me, they had no more work for me. So then I went back to Riley because they needed someone to look after the new tools. This was after I had surgery, he said. Then I had to have surgery again, and then I didn’t come back, the job was finished.
Dickson was asked during cross examination if his back pain had been getting worse over the last few years. He answered yes, since 1986. When asked if he continued to get worse after 1992, Dickson responded somewhat as he would sit in his chair at the table holding his hand for hours not able to get any exercise. The pain down my leg his gotten worse since 1986; you’re getting older, you’re wearing out, Dickson stated. When asked when he started using his cane, Dickson answered that his back had started getting pretty severe about 8 or 9 weeks ago and about four weeks ago he started using a cane. When I stand for a little while my leg and foot goes numb and that’s why I needed the cane, he stated. He was asked if his problems with his ankles had gotten better, worse or stayed the same in the last seven years; Dickson answered that they had probably gotten a little bit worse as far as swelling. He was asked if he did a lot of hand work during the ABB job. Dickson responded yes, everything you did was with your hands. You were either lifting something, holding something or working on something, he said. I was not welding on the ABB job, Dickson stated, I was tacking. Dickson stated that he had worked as a general foreman with ABB at that time and he was not suppose to be working but rather supervising. I had a little trouble with that, he said, because whenever I saw somebody in a strain I always had a habit of helping them. Dickson was asked if he felt he would have been physically able to do the foreman job if he wasn’t doing the physical labor. He answered no, because you cannot give instructions from down on the ground to someone a hundred feet above you, you have to be able to hold onto a ladder or a crane or a work basket.
On redirect, Dickson was queried that he worked for ABB up to his first surgery; he responded that he worked for ABB, then was laid off, and this is when he got into the carpal tunnel syndrome. He agreed that he did not go to work for Riley until after the first surgery. Dickson agreed that he had testified during cross examination that his back pain had gotten worse after the hand injury because of the way he was sitting for long periods of time holding his hand. He added that he thought that contributed to some of it, but also the jolt that he took on that accident, in his opinion, did some damage to his back as well. Dickson noted, though, that he had a walker just for getting up because he was getting stiff and weak from the lack of exercise and sitting there.
The following medical records were admitted into evidence:
Exhibit No. F) were treatment reports concerning Dickson’s work related back injury in or about July 1988. Included in the initial examination report of September 19, 1988 by Dr. Weber was the following:
(Dickson) is five weeks from his accident. The symptoms that he has are directly related to the accident. I feel that he has also aggravated a pre-existing osteoarthritic situation in his spine. As you know, he had a lumbar laminectomy in 1971.
He has no signs of a disc at this time and he has no nerve root irritation. He has a lot of weakness in his legs and he has some arthritic changes in his knees and in his back.
I have put him on an anti-arthritic medication. He is getting better from the accident and I do not think there is gong to be any significant problems. He has aggravated a previously asymptomatic osteoarthritis back. Sometimes this is difficult to treat, but not impossible.
In a November 3, 1988 report by Dr. Donald Stronsky, an officemate of Dr. Weber, it was written that Dickson was being seen for a follow-up of injuries sustained when he fell approximately 18 feet. At that time he developed pain and discomfort in the legs and in the low back area, it was written. Further noted was that Dickson had returned to work, but had had a couple of other episodes that had caused recurrent back discomfort and that he had not been able to work since then. Dr. Stronsky’s written impression was low back strain with some possible compressive injury to articular surfaces in the lumbar area and probably in the ankle area from dropping this distance. In a November 25, 1988 examination report, Dr. Weber wrote the following:
(Dickson) has lots of complaints that he said were not there prior to the accident, but I told him I felt a good deal of them would have been there even without the accident because many of them are secondary to arthritic changes that he has in his body.
He is to continue with the anti-arthritic medication and will return in two months. I will re-x-ray him at that time with reevaluation.
Dr. Weber wrote the following in a February 3, 1989 examination report:
Enclosed is a copy of the CAT scan on Jack Dickson which was made at St. Joseph Hospital on 1/28/89. As you see, he has degenerative disc disease at L5-S1. That is where he had the surgery before in 1971. I don’t feel that this is the problem that happened in the injury on 8/15/88. Since this accident, he has persisted in having pain in his back with pain and weakness in his legs, especially the left leg. Possibly the central herniation at L4-5 that shows on the CAT scan could explain this. It is not diagnostic before an objective definite diagnosis of a ruptured disc at this level could be made. Another myelogram would need to be done. He is dead set against any surgery. I told him that unless he considered surgery, I don’t feel that the myelogram is indicated.
In a May 26, 1989 examination report, Dr. Weber wrote that he felt Dickson was at a point where he was not improving, and that continued treatment was not indicated. He has permanent partial disability of the low back in the range of 20 percent permanent partial disability over and above the disability that preceded the accident, Dr. Weber wrote. The doctor further wrote that Dickson had been discharged. Dr. Weber wrote in a November 24, 1988 examination report that Dickson had lost a second job because of his back. I have referred Dickson to a spine surgeon as I feel he probably should have a spinal fusion between L5-S1 with plates. In a June 13, 1990 letter to the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier, Dr. Weber discussed the Dickson’s treatment after the work accident and that he had ultimately referred Dickson to Dr. David Robson for surgery. I have not heard form Dr. Robson so I am not aware if Dickson has seen him; I don’t know anything of his current status since November of 1989, Dr. Weber wrote.
2. Reviewing the medical records described as those of Dr. Jeffrey L. Draves, M.D. (Claimant’s Exhibit No. I) and the medical records of Dr. Ronald J. Auclair, M.D., a Rheumatologist (Claimant’s Exhibit No. H), the earliest document in these records is a May 24, 1991 letter from Dr. Draves to Dr. Auclair in which Dr. Draves writes the following:
I have asked Mr. Dickson to see you regarding his joints. For the past month, he has been bothered by a swelling in his hands. He had noted some swelling in the knees as well as weakness in his shoulders and thighs. Before seeing me, he had been treated with various nonsteroidals without improvement.
When I first saw him, May 9, 1991, his hands were quite swollen. The swelling was diffuse throughout his hands and not limited to any particular joints. There was limited flexion, and he was virtually unable to grip. His knees were somewhat swollen as well, although, no definite effusion was noted. I placed him on Prednisone 40mg tapered over a two-week period. Today, he returned for follow-up and the swelling has improved quite a bit. However, he continues to have limitation in his grip. I have continued him on Prednisone 10mg daily as the previous nonsteroidals were ineffective.
Dr. Auclair’s June 10, 1991 examination notes as well as a June 10, 1991 examination report to Dr. Draves were in the records. The following excerpts were included in Dr. Auclair’s June 10, 1991 examination report:
(Jack D. Dickson) presented with the chief complaint of hand swelling, stiffness, and decreased grip. He gives the following history:
Approximately nine months ago, he began noticing some stiffness particularly in the morning. He did not feel "real spry." Approximately six months ago he developed malaise and fever and was seen in the emergency room at Lucy Lee Hospital in Poplar Bluff where a diagnosis of "pneumonia" was made. He was treated with medications "got better," but not back to normal.
Approximately three months ago, after using a household cleaner on a water boiler, he developed an erythematous rash about the dorsum of the hands, forearms, face, and ears with subsequent peeling of the skin. Approximately 2 1/2 months ago swelling, stiffness and limitations of motion of the hands developed for which he saw a physician who prescribed Naprosyn 375 mg. b.i.d. Because of lack of improvement, he returned at which time Allopurinal 300 mg. o.d. was begun. Following these medications, "purple blotches" developed about the upper extremities. He thus consulted you approximately six weeks ago.
Of note is that approximately two months ago he did develop stiffness in the knees and approximately several weeks ago, pain and swelling in the ankles also occurred.
* *
There is no history of recent unexplained fever, Raynard’s hematuria, or symptoms suggestive of Sjogren’s syndrome. He has lost 10 pounds during the past six months. Since the onset of his hand symptoms, he has also had intermittent numbness in the fingers of the hands, particularly the right hand, primarily with driving. Of note is that three years ago he saw Dr. Charles Miller, a dermatologist, for a breaking out of the scalp (seborrheic dermatitis; r/o psoriasis). This breaking out has completely subsided since the institution of Prednisone recently.
Dr. Auclair noted Dickson’s past medical history including that he is 21 years post-status lumbar laminectomy, and three years ago he had fallen 18-20 feet landing on his feet and developing soft tissue injuries about the ankles associated with swelling and ecchymosis. Examination findings on June 10, 1991, Dr. Auclair wrote, included:
Neurological: Good muscle strength except for grip strength as noted
below and 3 out of 5 left hamstring strength. No muscle
tenderness. Reflexes 2+ except for trace to absent left
Achilles tendon reflex and 4/5 left hip flexor. Negative
Tinel and Phelan’s sign bilaterally at the wrists.
Joints:
Cervical and thoracic vertebrae: Unrevealing.
Lumbar vertebrae: Well-healed laminectomy incisional scar.
Hands: Fists: 95%
Grips: 75-80%
Mild diffuse puffiness of the hands.
The remaining joints are within normal limits.
Dr. Auclair wrote the following impressions and recommendations:
Impressions: 1. An underlying connective tissue disease could explain
the polyarthalgias, suspected arthritis, and positive ANA.
2. Bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, probably related to 1.
3. History of ulcer disease years ago.
4. Twenty-one years post-status lumbar laminectomy
5. History of scalp rash for which a diagnosis of seborrheic
dermatitis vs. psoriasis has been given.
Recommend: 1. Rest for the hands and wrists as much as possible.
2. Possible local steroid injection beneath the flexor
retinaculum of the right wrist.
3. Possible carpal tunnel release if carpal tunnel symptoms
should worsen.
4. Gradual tapering of the Prednisone dose.
5. Continued observation should ultimately further clarify
the above and dictate future therapy. I saw Mr. Dickson
again on 6/26/91 at which time he had lowered his
Prednisone to 2 mg. o.d. and felt somewhat more achy.
Physical examination was essentially unchanged from
his initial visit. I suggested that he continue with
Prednisone up to several mg. daily for the time being and
that I see him again in approximately three to four
weeks.
Dr. Auclair’s treatment notes indicated that he continued to treat Dickson with medications including Prednisone through 1991, 1992 and 1993 with a last treatment entry of 3-17-93. In an 8-21-91 entry the following was noted:
Mr. Dickson returns stating that he was doing fairly well on just 5 mg. of Prednisone but then had to leave for Delaware where he worked for five weeks, 12 hours a day, seven days a week. He uses his hands quite a bit in his work. He thus had to increase the Prednisone to 8 mg. o.d. and was fairly comfortable at this dose. He has had some discomfort in the left lower extremity also.
Physical exam findings on 8-21-91 were: Hands – really essentially unchanged from his initial visit with mild diffuse puffiness of the fingers without tenderness. A 3-12-92 entry noted that Dickson had been working out of town and had been unable to return since his last visit six months earlier but had continued with Prednisone. Also written was:
Three months ago he had a flare involving the right 2nd MCP joint and left wrist with pain and swelling for which he increased the Prednisone to 13 mg. daily. He has since cut down to 12 mg. daily though he still has difficulty in these areas. He has had minimal difficulty elsewhere with regards to his underlying inflammatory arthritis.
Examination findings on 3-12-92 included: mild to moderate diffuse puffiness of the fingers of both hands; right 2nd MCP joint tenderness and swelling; left wrist tenderness swelling dorsally, and limitation of dorsiflexion and palmar flexion; remaining joints are essentially unrevealing. Dr. Auclair wrote that his impressions were the same. The next treatment entry of 12-9-92 noted Dickson’s complaints that he had had progression of his arthritis with involvement of the shoulder, wrists, hands, knees and feet. Also written was: "The worst areas are the left hand and wrist. He has fairly persistent numbness in the fingers primarily of the left 1st, 2nd and 3rd fingers." It was noted that Dickson "had not worked much since his last visit, partially due to the lack of work but also due to his inability to work available jobs requiring much strenuous physical labor. Physical exam findings on 12-9-92 included: diffuse swelling and tenderness in the fingers of both hands; in the right wrist, no tenderness but swelling and limitation of palmar flexion as well as a positive Tinel sign; in the left wrist, tenderness and swelling, and a greater limitation of motion and pain. Physical examination findings continued with:
Neurologic: There is patchy decreased sensation about the median nerve distribution in the right hand. There is significant decreased sensation to light touch and pinprick about the median nerve distribution to the left hand including the medial aspect of the right 4th finger but not the lateral aspect.
IMP: 1. Rheumatoid arthritis with carpal tunnel syndrome, much worse on the left side.
Included in the recommendations in Dr. Auclair’s 12/9/92 treatment note was: bilateral median nerve conduction studies, and that Dickson was advised to consider a left carpal tunnel release at which time a flexor tenosynovectomy could be performed about the left wrist. A 12-30-92 EMG and nerve conduction report was in the record and reported the following conclusions: "Note prolonged terminal latency of right sensory median orthodromic, left motor median, left sensory median – Findings may reflect a left carpal tunnel syndrome, early right carpal tunnel syndrome." In a January 4, 1993 referral letter from Dr. Auclair to Dr. Robert Tucker, M.D. concerning Jack D. Dickson, Dr. Auclair wrote that Dickson was to see Dr. Tucker on January 14, 1993. Dr. Auclair further wrote that Dickson "has rheumatoid arthritis with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, much worse on the left side where extensive tenosynovitis is also present". "I have advised left carpal tunnel release with tenosynovectomy", Dr. Auclair wrote.
Dr. Tucker wrote of his evaluation of Dickson’s left hand in a January 14, 1993 report to Dr. Auclair (See Claimant’s Exhibit No. F). The following was included in Dr. Tucker’s report:
I appreciate your suggesting that he see me as well as all the information that you kindly provided. To summarize his history, he is a 58 year old gentleman with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis who is currently on Prednisone and Lodine. Over the past several months he has had increasing amounts of difficulty with swelling, pain and numbness in the right hand. He has been aware of marked swelling over the volar aspect of the hand and wrist on the left side, with occasional crepitation in the small finger. As a result of the pain he has had decreased strength and decreased flexibility in the fingers. In addition, he has had increasing amounts of numbness and tingling involving primarily the index, long and ring fingers. There has been some involvement of the thumb but little involvement of the small finger. He has not had significant difficulty with either his elbow or his shoulder on that side. The right side bothers him minimally. Apparently some of the more potent anti-arthritics were discussed with him, but he did not want to pursue that avenue of treatment. He is a construction worker but has not worked for several months. Prior to that he did attempt to work as long as possible, but was limited by his hand. He previously had some back problems, but apparently has had no other serious health problems other than his arthritis.
After discussing his examination findings, Dr. Tucker wrote in his January 14, 1993 evaluation report his impressions:
Mr. Dickson obviously has rather florid flexor tenosynovitis causing secondary median nerve compression. He is in need of an extensive flexor tenosynovectomy beginning in the distal forearm and extending at least to the small finger. The other fingers probably at this point do not need to be explored. The median nerve will be decompressed by this procedure. However, he recognizes that this is not a simple carpal tunnel release and that he will need some extensive rehabilitation, probably lasting for two or three months postoperatively. However, because of the significant nature of his flexor tenosynovitis, it is felt that this is certainly necessary and should be done in the near future. Tentatively he has been scheduled to have this done at St. Joseph Hospital on February 5.
3. Records from St. Joseph Hospital (Claimant’s Exhibit No. G) included the voluminous treatment and numerous hospitalizations and surgeries of Dickson in 1993 beginning with surgery for left carpal tunnel release and flexor tenosynovectomy, and then subsequent surgeries described as addressing septic arthritis. A 2/5/93 admission sheet noted that Dickson was admitted with a diagnosis of: Rheumatoid arthritis with severe flexor tenosynovitis and median nerve compression, left wrist and hand. The history of present illness in the admission sheet was:
This is a 58-year old, white male with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis, currently treated with Prednisone and Lodine. Over the past several months he has had increasing amounts of difficulty with pain, swelling and numbness involving both hands. On the right side he has had only minimal difficulty, but on the left side he has been aware of marked swelling over the volar aspect of the hand and wrist, with some crepitation. He has pain, decreased strength and decreased flexibility of his fingers, along with increasing amounts of numbness and tingling involving primarily the index, long and ring fingers. He has had some involvement of the thumb, but little involvement of the small finger.
Clinically he has marked flexor tenosynovitis, beginning just proximal to the carpal tunnel on the left side and extending into the palm of the hand. There is significant swelling extending along the course of the flexor tendons to the left small finger, with crepitation on flexion and extension. He also has physical findings consistent with median nerve compression.
The options of treatment have been discussed in detail with the patient, who is admitted at the present time for exploration of the flexor canal, with decompression of the carpal tunnel and flexor tenosynovectomy.
Dickson’s past medical history, current medications, social and family history as well as physical examination findings were discussed in the 2-5-93 admission sheet. The written impression was: Extensive flexor tenosynovitis, left wrist and palm, with secondary median nerve compression. A 2-5-93 operative report noted the following operation performed by Dr. Robert Tucker, M.D.: 1. Carpal tunnel release, left wrist; 2. Extensive flexor tenosynovectomy including the palm to the small finger; 3. Debridement of fat necrosis, left wrist. The history of illness noted in the 2-5-93 operative report was:
This is a 58-year-old white male with known rheumatoid arthritis, who has had progressive difficulty with numbness and tingling in both hands. He has been treated with Prednisone. He has had increasing amounts of symptoms on the left side where he has progressive numbness and tingling in the classic median nerve distribution. In addition he has clinical evidence of marked flexor tenosynovitis as well as a fluctuant area over the radial aspect of the wrist. The options of treatment have been reviewed in detail with the patient, who is now brought to the operating room for flexor tenosynovectomy and carpal tunnel decompression.
The preoperative diagnosis in the 2-5-93 operative report was: Rheumatoid arthritis with: 1. Flexor tenosynovitis, left wrist and palm, 2. Carpal tunnel compression. The postoperative diagnosis was: 1. Extensive flexor tenosynovitis, left wrist and palm; 2. Median nerve compression, left wrist; and 3. Fat necrosis, left wrist.
A 3/10/93 admission sheet noted that Dickson was admitted with a diagnosis of: Rheumatoid arthritis with possible wound infection, left wrist. The history of present illness in the 3/10/93 admission was:
This is a 58 year old white male with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis who on 2/5 underwent on extensive flexor tenosynovectomy, carpal tunnel release and debridement of his left wrist. Through a radial wrist incision an area that appeared to be fat necrosis was debrided. Patient was then started on physical therapy program and his operative wounds healed quite satisfactorily. Sutures were removed without difficulty. However, patient states that beginning on about 3/5 he became aware of swelling and redness over the radial aspect of the wrist. He did return to work on 3/3 but does not recall any history of trauma to the left wrist. On the morning of 3/9 the redness was significantly worse associated with swelling. He had no history of fever or chills. He presented to the office on 3/9 and had what looked to be an area of purulence in the radial wrist incision. This was incised under local anesthesia. A sample was sent for gram stain which showed no organisms and culture which was no growth after 24 hours. The material was very similar in appearance to the original material debrided from the patient although there did appear to be some evidence of purulence. Today the redness and swelling are both significantly improved but there continues to be some purulent drainage from the wound. He is, therefore, readmitted for formal incision and drainage of the wound.
Surgery was performed by Dr. Tucker during Dickson’s 3/10-14/93 hospitalization. The operative procedure was: incision and drainage of synovial fluid loculation, left wrist. The final diagnosis in the operative note was: synovial fluid loculation/fistula, left wrist.
Dickson was again admitted on 5/12/93 for the diagnosis of septic arthritis, left wrist and rheumatoid arthritis. Dr. Tucker wrote the following in the history section of the admission sheet:
This is a 58 year old white male who has had a complicated history over the past year related to his rheumatoid arthritis. Reference is made to his previous history and physical examination reports from two recent admissions. To summarize, over the past year he has had increasing amounts of swelling, diffusely in the left wrist and hand. He had localized flexor tenosynovitis causing secondary carpal tunnel compression and approximately two months ago, he underwent an extensive flexor tenosynovectomy and carpal tunnel decompression. At that time he also had incision of fluctuant area on the radial aspect of the wrist which may have represented a loculated area of synovial fluid. For approximately four weeks postoperatively, the patient did well but then developed drainage from the radial aspect of the wound. Wound infection was suspected and the patient underwent formal incision and drainage in the operating room with findings of more synovial fluid like material. Multiple cultures were negative as was histologic examination, and it was felt the patient had developed a synovial fistula. This did improve dramatically when he was placed on high dose steroids and five days prior to this admission, the patient was seen in the office, at which time he had only mild dorsal swelling at his wrist and a pin point area of intermittent drainage on the radial aspect of the wrist. To that point, there had been no evidence of infection such as purulence or erythema. He had had no fevers.
Apparently 40 hours prior to admission, the patient began having increasing amounts of pain in the left wrist. In the 24 hours prior to admission, he developed fever to a high of 102, and on presentation in the office on the day of admission, he had obvious purulent drainage with evidence of a septic arthritis of the wrist. He is admitted at the present time for irrigation and debridement.
In a 5/13/93 consultation report Dr. J. Speiser wrote the following history of illness:
This is a 58 year old white male who states that he developed a rash on his face and hands about 2-1/2 years ago. At about the same time his joints began getting stiff and tight. He did not really have that much swelling, but it did interfere with his work. He saw Dr. Auclair and was diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis. Over the last 2-1/2 years, the patient has been treated with Prednisone 5 to 10 mg per day. He states that he has only been tried on 1 anti-inflammatory drug and that was Lodine. He also reports that the Prednisone caused him to be irritable, made him gain weight, and made his face cushingoid. When he tried the anti-inflammatory drug Lodine, it was not effective. His current problems with left wrist stem from surgery that he had done back in February of this year, which was apparently a radical flexor tenosynovectomy and carpal tunnel release in the left hand. In March, he had accumulation of fluid under the skin and he states that Dr. Tucker lanced that. The next day he operated on it again for a synovial fistula. The drainage decreased postoperatively with high doses of Prednisone. Two days ago the patient began running fevers and Dr. Tucker felt that the area on his wrist was now infected. Cultures of synovial fluid done back in February and March were all negative.
Dr. Speiser’s written impression was:
Rheumatoid arthritis with persistent synovial fluid drainage from the left wrist, which is apparently now infected. The patient has never been treated with disease modifying drugs for his rheumatoid arthritis. The only thing he has really taken over the last 2-1/2 years is low dose Prednisone 5 to 10 mg a day, which is in itself causing side effects.
In addition to a recommendation for postoperative steroid coverage of Prednisone, further written recommendations by Dr. Speiser were:
After the patient’s wrist infection is adequately treated, I would consider him to be a candidate for Methotrexate or some other disease modifying drug, which will hopefully get better control of his synovitis. In the meantime, I would either continue him on the 5 mg of Prednisone or switch him to an anti-inflammatory medication. The patient would like to get off Prednisone and that might allow us to do it.
The surgical procedure performed by Dr. Tucker on 5/12/93 was: incision and drainage of left wrist and mid carpal joints with incision and drainage of operative wound left wrist. The postoperative diagnosis was: septic arthritis left wrist. Another operation was performed during Dickson’s 5/12-20/93 hospitalization on or about 5/18/99. The surgical procedure performed by Dr. Tucker was an incision and drainage of soft tissue left wrist. The postoperative diagnosis was: synoval fistula or fat necrosis left wrist.
4. The medical records of Dr. Donald King, M.D. (Claimant’s Exhibit No. J) indicated that this doctor began treating Dickson following a 5-14-93 consultation during Dickson’s hospitalization in St. Joseph Hospital. In his 5-14-93 consultation report, Dr. King included the following in the history of present illness section:
I was asked to see and evaluate this 58 year old male with rheumatoid arthritis, who now has a septic joint involving the left wrist. This is seen currently, three months after carpal tunnel surgery on this same side.
Mr. Dickson has had recent onset of rheumatoid arthritis over the last two years, presenting acutely with a rash and poly-arthralgia/polyarthritis. He apparently developed carpal tunnel symptoms, disproportionately on the left side compared to the right and underwent carpal tunnel release in February, 1993.
After discussing physical examination and laboratory findings, Dr. King’s written impression was that he agreed with Dr. Tucker that Dickson had a septic arthritis involving his left wrist, and that the Staph could be treated directly.
Dr. King’s record indicated that he continued to treat Dickson for an infected wrist into 1994. A March 8, 1994 treatment entry noted that Dickson had an infected left wrist and complaints of ankle swelling. Dickson’s continued complaints of ankle swelling were noted in the May 17, 1994 entry. Maintenance of the left wrist infection was also noted. A treatment entry noted that the left wrist was beginning to fuse. The last treatment entry of 7-19-94 noted maintenance of wrist infection. Also written was: concerning hand, rheumatoid arthritis with septic in the past.
5. The records of Dr. James Speiser, M.D. of the Arthritis Associates, Inc. (Claimant’s Exhibit No. C) noted in a January 1, 1994 treatment entry the following history, x-ray findings and the doctor’s treatment recommendations:
(History): The patient is seen today for routine follow up of his left wrist. Overall he has had less pain in the wrist. His function has remained about the same although he is adapting to the limited gripping ability in his left hand. He has had no drainage and no signs at all of infection. He is on Prednisone and Voltaren as well as Allopurinol for his arthritis.
(X-rays): Show marked destruction of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints with ulnar translocation and some volar subluxation of the carpus. This represents a progression of the arthritis that was present on XR’s 1 year ago.
(Treatment): Certainly the next steps radiographically would be arthrodesis of the wrist and resection of the distal ulna, however, the patient does not have enough discomfort in the wrist itself to justify this. It is possible that with immobilization of the wrist with his brace, he might develop a spontaneous arthrodesis or at least a dense ankylosis that return to near full time use of his cockup wrist splint. Continue with finger exercises, but he should avoid passive exercises at the wrist.
Dr. Speiser noted in a 3-9-94 treatment entry that Dickson has rheumatoid arthritis and that he was just taking Naprosyn. His left wrist does feel better when he takes the Naprosyn, Dr. Speiser wrote. In the last treatment entry in Dr. Speiser’s record, dated 6/22/99, the following was included:
(Dickson) still takes Naprosyn, but tries to take it just once per day for a few days and then he might change it to bid for a couple of days. The problem is, he still gets significant amounts of bloating from the medication, and he can only tolerate it bid for short period of time. He has tried most of the other anti-inflammatory drugs and they just did not work as well as the Naprosyn did. His hands look fairly good today. He still has a little swelling in the right 2nd MCP and to a lesser extent the left 2nd MCP. The left wrist is still swollen, but there is not much soft tissue swelling there. He has the scars from his previous drainage procedures on that left wrist. He cannot make a fist with his left hand hardly at all. He does use it to push things along and that sometimes causes pain in the left wrist, too. At this point, I feel like we have tried just about everything that I can think of. We tried having him take Pepcid, along with the Naprosyn, to see if that would keep his stomach under better control, but it did not seem to help at all. He will just continue with the current method.
6. The records of Dr. Paul R. Manske, M.D. (Claimant’s Exhibit No. D) (See, also, Claimant’s Exhibit No. E – Barnes Hospital records) began with a January 17, 1995 evaluation report which noted that Dickson was referred for evaluation of swelling and purulence on the volar surface of the left wrist. The doctor noted that Dickson had had a surgical release of his left carpal tunnel in February of 1993 and had postoperatively presentation of purulence which required drainage. Subsequent treatment of the purulence was discussed by Dr. Manske. Of interest, the doctor wrote, is the patient’s history of arthritis for which he currently takes Naprosyn, and in the past he took Prednisone. Examination findings on January 17, 1995 included that Dickson had a significant wrist deformity both clinically and radiographically. For the diagnosis of acid fast microbacteria infection of the left wrist, Dr. Manske performed on February 1, 1995 the surgery of: debride wrist joint and distal radial ulnar joint, partial wound closure three drainage sites. A February 9, 1995 x-ray noted the following impressions:
Destructive changes of the carpus and distal radius and ulna, as detailed above. Given the associated periosteal reaction of the distal radius, this most likely represents infection with progression of destruction when compared with the prior examination.
Diffuse marked soft tissue swelling about the left wrist.
In subsequent post-operative follow-ups, Dr. Manske wrote that Dickson had limited wrist motion and limited finger motion and the wrist was swollen, but there was no erythema and no tenderness. The doctor noted that x-rays showed significant loss of carpal bones and space. Dr. Manske’s record indicated that the last appointment with Dickson was on July 11, 1995.
Dr. Joseph H. Morrow, Jr., D.O., an osteopathic physician and surgeon, testified by deposition on behalf of the claimant. Dr. Morrow stated that he examined the claimant on the claimant’s behalf on January 24, 1996 concerning an injury of October 21, 1992. Medical records he reviewed were discussed by Dr. Morrow. The doctor identified the examination report he had prepared at the time of his examination of Jack Dickson (Claimant’s Deposition Exhibit 2. Ruling: Second Injury Fund’s objection to the admission of Claimant’s Deposition Exhibit 2 is overruled. Morrow Dp. pg. 9)
Dr. Morrow was given a hypothetical question from the claimant which noted that "…on or about October 21st, 1992 while Jack Dickson was working at the Labadie Union Electric Power Plant he injured his left wrist. His work involved repetitive use of his hands and he began to get stiffness in his left wrist in October of ’92. He came under the care of Dr. Auclair…" (Morrow Dp. pp. 10-11) The hypothetical question continued with the treatment Dickson had had including that he had had a left carpal tunnel release and extensive flexor tenosynovectomy performed by Dr. Tucker on February 5, 1993 and subsequent surgeries concerning staph auerus infection. Further noted in the hypothetical was that Dickson had had bilateral wrist and hand arthritic problems treated by Dr, Auclair in 1991, and had injured his back and undergone disk removal and spinal fusion at L5-S1 in 1971 with additional treatment in September and October of 1988. Dr. Morrow was then asked his diagnosis. The doctor answered:
"Reference the injury of 10-21-92 associated with his repetitive use of his left hand at his place of employment in the nature of his work would be the initial carpal tunnel condition along with extensive flexor tenosynovectomy including the palm to the small finger with debridement of fat necrosis of the left wrist reference the median nerve compression of the left wrist (carpal tunnel syndrome) fat necrosis and extensive flexor tenosynovitis (sic); subsequently followed with several incision and drainage procedures; the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with an acute flare-up as of March ’93 necessitating a continued incision and drainage of synovial fluid loculation of the left wrist with long-term antibiotic and steroid medications, aseptic arthritis with further incision and drainage in May ’93 with the final surgery of 2-1-95 being associated with a deep infection of the left wrist with debridement and infection at which time acid fast studies revealed the acid fast micro bacterial infection of the left wrist (micro-bacteria tuberculosis) and subsequent to that begun on additional medications for the treatment of TB that had been cultured. He takes Rifadin, 300 milligrams twice a day, and Isoniazid, 300 milligrams twice daily, for the pain and inflammation and also Lasix 40 milligrams which is a diuretic that helps reduce the swelling, and is to be on these medications up until August ’96, and then will require intermittent follow-up with studies and tests by the infectious disease specialist and rheumatologist specialists in that regard." (Morrow Dp. pp. 13-14. Ruling: Second Injury Fund’s objection to hypothetical question on grounds question contained facts which are not in evidence is overruled. Morrow Dp. pg. 12)
Dr. Morrow stated that the condition he diagnosed was causally related to Dickson’s employment at ABB Combustion. The doctor stated that he rated Dickson at 95% permanent partial disability of the left upper extremity at the level of the wrist as a result the October 1992 work injury while working for ABB Combustion. It was Dr. Morrow’s further opinion that Dickson had sustained preexisting permanent partial disability of "…25 percent of the body as a whole referenced to the prior hernia (sic) of the lumbar disk and the need for the discectomy and spinal fusion at L5-S1.." for the 1971 surgery. (Morrow Dp. pg. 15. Ruling: Second Injury Fund’s objection on grounds of hearsay, relevance, that Section 287.190.6 is not applicable in this case and Seven Day Rule upon Dr. Morrow’s opinion on preexisting disability concerning the back is overruled. Morrow Dp. pp. 15 and 16) The doctor further agreed and opined that Dickson’s preexisting permanent partial disability regarding his low back combined with his work permanent partial disability to the left wrist to provide a greater overall disability. (Ruling: Second Injury Fund’s objection on grounds of Seven Day Rule upon Dr. Morrow’s opinion on combination of disabilities is overruled. Morrow Dp. pg. 16) Dr. Morrow was asked if he had an opinion as to whether Dickson was permanently and totally disabled and the doctor testified:
"I gave a list of restrictions on page 12 of my report as to what the patient should or should not do, primarily with regards to the left upper extremity, and noted that in the even that there were no work available to meet the restrictions with the upper extremity, considering the patient’s age, the work that he had been doing in the past, then he would be unemployable in the open labor market, which I would defer to a vocational rehabilitation expert." (Morrow Dp. pg. 17. Ruling: Second Injury Fund’s objection on grounds of foundation is overruled. Morrow Dp. pg. 17)
On cross examination by the Second Injury Fund, the following testimony was given by Dr. Morrow concerning the work history at ABB Dickson had given him:
Q. And Mr. Dickson gave you the history that when he went to work for ABB Combustion engineering he was doing work that included fabricating steel, raising steel, setting the lay out, fitting, welding and testing, repetitive use of his ands, etc., is that true?
A. Yes.
Q. He also gave you a history of doing work that involved lifting heavy I-beams and structural steel in pulling on hoists, is that true?
A. Yes. All the lifting that he did actually was utilizing hoists and using ratchet handles and so forth to lift the steel. He was not lifting it by hand.
Q. Okay. It was still a fairly physical job; isn’t that true?
A. Yes. He would be hooking it up and then cranes would be operated by others that would lift it. There was some physical work but he was not doing the heavy lifting of the I-beams himself.
Q. He gave you a history, it’s the last sentence actually on the first page, that he’d been doing a similar type of work for over 41 years; is that true?
A. On the first page?
Q. Bottom of the first page, last sentence, going to the top of the second page.
A. Yes, that’s correct.
Q. And the majority of those 41 years would have been after the 1971 original back injury that he gave you in his history; is that true?
A. Yes, it would have been about half of it, second half of the 41 years. (Morrow Dp. pp. 18-20)
Dr. Morrow admitted during cross examination that he did not examine Dickson’s back when he saw him in 1996. The doctor stated that he was under the assumption that Dickson worked the normal shift as all other employees when he got injured at ABB Combustion. The following testimony then occurred about his understanding of Dickson’s ability to work with regards to his back:
Q. Did you ask him specifically whether and how his back affected his work at ABB Combustion or at his prior employer? I’m not asking for you to refer to any medical records, but I’m asking did you take a history from him specifically regarding those issues?
A. Other than the fact that he still had low-back complaints that he relates had been present prior to the surgery, and then back complaints subsequent, and after having been given the disability award, which is ordinarily presumed permanent, and the fact that he did continue to have low-back pain, then I deferred to the award that had been awarded by the judge as being a valid award, and since he did continue to have pain complaints, I felt that that award would still be in effect at the time of my exam. (Morrow Dp. pp. 20-21)
ISSUES: Whether or not the claimant sustained an accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment; Medical causation
At the hearing, the Second Injury Fund offered into evidence the Division file for this case. In the Division file was the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement form setting forth the settlement between the employee and the employer/insurer in this case approved by an Administrative Law Judge on April 28, 1998. In Conley v. Treasurer of Missouri, No. ED75002,slip op. at 9 (Mo.App. E.D. Aug. 3, 1999) the Court, although acknowledging that the Missouri Workers’ Compensation statutory provision setting forth the requirements of Second Injury Fund liability (Section 287.220.1) provides for a separate liability of the employer and the Fund (citing Grant v. Neal, 381 S.W.2d 838, 842), held that the settlement between the employee and employer/insurer was relevant as proof of the employee’s disability from his last injury, a requirement of Fund liability. The Court in Conley further wrote that to find that the settlement was inadmissible would permit the employee to relitigate his percentage of PPD resulting from his last injury and collaterally attack the award, defeating its finality. Another requirement for Fund liability under Section 287.220 is that an employee "receives a subsequent compensable injury". Considering the settlement stipulation in this case, it reflects that the employee and employer/insurer entered into a compromise lump sum settlement in the amount of $9000.00 based upon an approximate disability of 22 ½ % of the left hand at the level of the wrist. The settlement stated that on or about 10/21/92 Jack Dickson sustained an accidental injury/occupational disease. A designation of whether or not the employee had sustained an accident or an occupational disease was not made. Also indicated on the settlement form was that the weekly compensation rate was in dispute, and that the employer/insurer paid no medical expenses and no temporary total disability benefits. The settlement further stated that are disputes between the parties as to: "all issues were in dispute, including but not limited to: compensation rate; past and future medical bills & expenses & treatment; past and future TTD; PPD; disfigurement; all injuries to date; medical causation; nature and extent of injury; whether injury arose out of course of employment". Additionally, the settlement stated that any payment by the Second Injury Fund was left "open". Thus the issues of whether or not the claimant sustained an accident or an occupational disease on or about 10/21/92 was never determined or "litigated".
At the time of Dickson’s alleged work injury, Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law defined "accident" and "occupational disease" as follows:
The word "accident" as used in this chapter shall, unless a different meaning is clearly indicated by the context, be construed to mean an unexpected or unforeseen event happening suddenly and violently, with or without human fault, and producing at the time objective symptoms of an injury. Section 287.020.2 RSMo 1992
* *
In this chapter the term "occupational disease" is hereby defined to mean a disease arising out of and in the course of the employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensable, except where the diseases follow as an incident of an occupational disease as defined in this section. A disease shall be deemed to arise out of the employment only if there is apparent to the rational mind upon consideration of all the circumstances a direct causal connection between the conditions under which the work is performed and the occupational disease, and which can be seen to have followed as a natural incident of the work as a result of the exposure occasioned by the nature of the employment and which can be fairly traced to the employment as the proximate cause, and which does not come from a hazard to which workers would have been equally exposed outside of the employment. The disease must be incidental to the character of the business, and not independent of the relation of employer and employee. The disease need not to have been foreseen or expected but after its contraction it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence. Section 287.067.1 RSMo 1992
Reviewing of the evidence presented at the hearing, Dickson, the claimant, who was found to be a credible witness, testified that he has worked as a boilermaker/construction journeyman all of his years of employment since 1951. In 1991 while working for ABB Combustion Engineering he began having problems with his left hand, Dickson said, and agreed that he saw a Dr. Auclair in June of 1991. He agreed that he was then off work for a few weeks to try and let the soreness and swelling go out of his hand, and that he then returned to work at ABB. Dickson described the work he did throughout the day as a boilermaker at ABB as hand intensive. He stated that continuing to work aggravated his left wrist and it got worse and took longer to recuperate. Dr. Auclair referred me to Dr. Tucker for carpal tunnel surgery, Dickson testified. Dickson stated that he agreed with Dr. Tucker’s record when he first saw the doctor in January of 1993 that over the past several months he had had increasing amounts of difficulty with swelling, pain and numbness in the left hand. On cross examination, Dickson described an occasion while working at ABB where an 80-pound steel sheet fell down on his left hand and bent it back. After this is when my pain never ceased up until surgery, Dickson testified. He stated that the sheet metal falling on his hand happened the night all employees got laid off from ABB. Dickson stated that he then had carpal tunnel surgery and then went to work at Riley Construction. I worked for Riley, I believe, for three weeks then I had to go back in for a second surgery, Dickson testified. The evidence establishes that Dickson subsequently went through numerous more left wrist/hand surgeries addressing a Staph infection, the last being in 1995.
In his Claim for Compensation form filed with the Division in this case, Dickson alleges that while in the course of employment, he sustained an accident on approximately 10/21/92 resulting in injuries to the left hand and body as a whole.
Dr. Joseph Morrow examined the claimant and gave deposition testimony, both on the claimant’s behalf. At his deposition, Dr. Morrow was given a hypothetical question in which he was to assume that "on or about October 21st, 1992 while Jack Dickson was working at the Labadie Union Electric Power Plant he injured his left wrist. His work involved repetitive use of his hands and he began to get stiffness in his left wrist in October of ’92". In his January 24, 1996 examination report (Claimant’s Deposition Exhibit 2), Dr. Morrow wrote:
Jack Dickson was seen on 1-24-96 concerning injuries sustained in an accident that occurred on 10-21-92.
The patient became employed by ABB Combustion Engineering Co. around February 1992 and worked up until the injury of 10-21-92 working at Labadie Union Electric power plant when the injury occurred. The patient’s work included……..He had been a boiler maker for 41+ years doing similar type of work.
He began to get some stiffness in the left wrist with repetitive use of his hands at his place of employment in the latter part of 1992 around October 1992 with regard to stiffness. He went to Dr. Auclair, M.D, an arthritis specialist.
Dr. Morrow’s conclusions at his deposition and in his report was that as a result of "the injury of 10-21-92 associated with his repetitive use of his left hand at his place of employment in the nature of his work would be the initial carpal tunnel condition along with extensive flexor tenosynovectomy including the palm to the small finger with debridement of fat necrosis of the left wrist reference the median nerve compression of the left wrist (carpal tunnel syndrome) fat necrosis and extensive flexor tenosynovitis (sic); subsequently followed with several incision and drainage procedures".
Treatment records offered and admitted into evidence made no reference to any event occurring at Dickson’s employment on or about 10/21/92; no reference to a steel sheet metal piece falling on Dickson’s left hand was made in the treatment records.
Considering the evidence it is found there is no evidence, including the medical opinions and treatment records, that corroborates the claimant’s testimony of an event occurring at work on or about 10-21-91 in which a steel sheet metal piece fell on the claimant’s left hand causing injury. Consequently, it is found that the substantial weight of the evidence does not establish that Dickson suffered an accident at work on or about 10-21-92.
The next consideration, therefore is whether or not Dickson sustained an occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment with ABB Combustion Engineering. In Bull v. Excel Corp., 985 S.W.2d 411 (Mo.App. W.D. 1999)the Court stated that the term "date of injury" does not have the same significance in a repetitive motion case as it does in cases involving specific injuries. The Court noted that the provisions dealing with occupational diseases (Sections 287.063 and 287.067.7) keyed in on the period of exposure to the repetitive motion (or an exposure to a hazard fairly traced to the employment) prior to the filing of the claim. The Court in Bull went on to say:
"Occupational diseases differ from compensable accidents or injuries where the date can be pinpointed with precision. Diseases such as carpal tunnel syndrome are progressive and not caused by a single event. They are difficult to diagnose, and it is difficult to determine a specific date of occurrence. The legislature, in promulgating (Section) 287.063 and (Section) 287.067, has chosen to place liability with the last employer who exposed the worker to the repetitive motion causing the condition." Bull, 985 S.W.2d at 416.
Thus, the Court in Bull stated, the Commission is not bound by an attempt by the parties via a stipulation to fix the "date of injury" in an occupational disease case as this is an attempt to fix a conclusion of law. Thus in this case, the date of an occupational disease, if any, is not fixed by the stipulation set forth in the settlement form entered into by the employee and employer/insurer in this case.
The claimant alleges that he sustained the condition of left carpal tunnel syndrome as a result of performing repetitive hand intensive work for ABB Combustion Engineering. All of the medical records and opinions indicate that Dickson sustained a left carpal tunnel syndrome condition. The treatment records, though, further indicate that Dickson is suffering from bilateral carpal tunnel described in those records as "rheumatoid arthritis with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, much worse on the left side where extensive tenosynovitis is also present". The treatment records indicate that Dickson had rheumatoid arthritis in other joints of his body as well. Dickson, it is found, is suffering from complicated medical conditions and thus proof of medial causation in this case is not within the realm of lay understanding and must be established by expert opinion. Griggs v. A.B. Chance Company, 503 S.W.2d 697, 704.
"Medical causation not within common knowledge or experience, must be established by scientific or medical evidence showing the cause and effect relationship between the complained of condition and the asserted cause." Selby v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 831 S.W.2d 221, 222 (Mo.App. 1992).
* * *
"A medical expert’s opinion must have in support of it reasons and facts supported by competent evidence which will give the opinion sufficient probative force to be substantial evidence." (citations omitted) See, generally, Pippin v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., 799 S.W.2d 898, 904 (Mo.App. 1990)
Thus, the first consideration is whether or not there is a direct causal connection between the conditions under which Dickson’s work was performed and the left carpal tunnel syndrome condition.
Reviewing the treatment records, Dr. Weber of the St. Louis Orthopedic Institute, Inc. noted in his September 19, 1988 examination report that Dickson’s July, 1988 back injury aggravated a pre-existing osteoarthritic situation in his spine. Dr. Weber further wrote that Dickson "has a lot of weakness in his legs and he has some arthritic changes in his knees and in his back", and that he was putting Dickson on anti-arthritic medication. In a May 24, 1991 letter to Dr. Ronald Auclair, a Dr. Jeffrey L. Draves wrote:
For the past month, (Dickson) has been bothered by a swelling in his hands. He had noted some swelling in the knees as well as weakness in his shoulders and thighs. Before seeing me, he had been treated with various nonsteroidals without improvement.
When I first saw him, May 9, 1991, his hands were quite swollen. The swelling was diffuse throughout his hands and not limited to any particular joints. There was limited flexion, and he was virtually unable to grip. His knees were somewhat swollen as well, although, no definite effusion was noted.
Dr. Draves further wrote that he had placed Dickson on Prednisone and his swelling had improved quite a bit, but Dickson continued to have limitation in his grip. Dr. Auclair, a Rheumatologist, wrote in a June 10, 1991 examination report that Dickson presented with the chief complaint of hand swelling, stiffness and decreased grip. History from Dickson, Dr. Auclair wrote, included that approximately nine months earlier Dickson had began noticing some stiffness particularly in the morning. He relayed that he did not feel "real spry", the doctor wrote. Dr. Auclair noted that Dickson developed malaise and fever approximately six months ago, and approximately three months ago after using a household cleaner developed an erythematous rash about the dorsum of the hands, forearms, face and ears. It was noted that: approximately 2 ½ months ago Dickson had swelling, stiffness and limitations of motion of the hands; that approximately 2 months ago he developed stiffness in the knees; and that approximately several weeks ago he developed pain and swelling in the ankles. Dr. Auclair further noted that since the onset of the hand symptoms, Dickson had also had intermittent numbness in the fingers of the hands, particularly the right hand, primarily with driving. The doctor wrote that of note is that three years ago Dickson had seen a dermatologist for a breaking out of the scalp (seborrheic dermatitis; r/o psoriasis). This breaking out has completely subsided since the institution of Prednisone recently, Dr. Auclair wrote. Dr. Auclair’s written impressions on June 10, 1991 included that he felt Dickson had: 1. an underlying connective tissue disease which could explain the polyarthalgias, suspected arthritis, and positive ANA; and b. a bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, probably related to 1. Recommendations by Dr, Auclair included that Dickson get "(R)est for the hands and wrists as much as possible". In an 8-21-91 entry Dr. Auclair noted that Dickson used his hands quite a bit in his work and thus had to increase his Prednisone. He has had some discomfort in the left lower extremity also, the doctor further wrote. In a 3-12-92 entry Dr. Auclair wrote:
Three months ago he had a flare involving the right 2nd MCP joint and left wrist with pain and swelling for which he increased the Prednisone to 13 mg. daily. He has since cut down to 12 mg. daily though he still has difficulty in these areas. He has had minimal difficulty elsewhere with regards to his underlying inflammatory arthritis.
In the next treatment entry of 12-9-92 Dr. Auclair noted Dickson’s complaints that he had had progression of his arthritis with involvement of the shoulder, wrists, hands, knees and feet. "The worst areas", the doctor wrote, "are the left hand and wrist. He has fairly persistent numbness in the fingers primarily of the left 1st, 2nd and 3rd fingers." Dr. Auclair noted that Dickson "had not worked much since his last visit, partially due to the lack of work but also due to his inability to work available jobs requiring much strenuous physical labor". Physical findings on 12-9-92 included: diffuse swelling and tenderness in the fingers of both hands; in the right wrist, no tenderness but swelling and limitation of palmar flexion as well as a positive Tinel sign; in the left wrist, tenderness and swelling, and a greater limitation of motion and pain. The diagnosis on 12-9-92 was: Rheumatoid arthritis with carpal tunnel syndrome, much worse on the left side. In a January 4, 1993 referral letter, Dr. Auclair wrote to Dr. Robert Tucker, M.D. that Dickson "has rheumatoid arthritis with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, much worse on the left side where extensive tenosynovitis is also present", and that "I have advised left carpal tunnel release with tenosynovectomy". After examination of Dickson on January 14, 1993, Dr. Tucker included the following in his written impressions:
Mr. Dickson obviously has rather florid flexor tenosynovitis causing secondary median nerve compression. He is in need of an extensive flexor tenosynovectomy beginning in the distal forearm and extending at least to the small finger. The other fingers probably at this point do not need to be explored. The median nerve will be decompressed by this procedure. However, he recognizes that this is not a simple carpal tunnel release and that he will need some extensive rehabilitation, probably lasting for two or three months postoperatively. However, because of the significant nature of his flexor tenosynovitis, it is felt that this is certainly necessary and should be done in the near future.
A 2-5-93 operative report noted that Dr. Tucker performed the surgical procedures of: Carpal tunnel release, left wrist; Extensive flexor tenosynovectomy including the palm to the small finger; and Debridement of fat necrosis, left wrist. The preoperative diagnosis in the 2-5-93 operative report was: Rheumatoid arthritis with: 1. Flexor tenosynovitis, left wrist and palm, 2. Carpal tunnel compression. The postoperative diagnosis was: 1. Extensive flexor tenosynovitis, left wrist and palm; 2. Median nerve compression, left wrist; and 3. Fat necrosis, left wrist. A 3/10/93 admission sheet completed by Dr. Tucker noted that Dickson was admitted with a diagnosis of Rheumatoid arthritis with possible wound infection, left wrist. The history of present illness included that Dickson was a man "with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis who on 2/5 underwent on extensive flexor tenosynovectomy, carpal tunnel release and debridement of his left wrist". In a 5-12-93 hospital admission sheet, Dr. Tucker included the following in the history section:
This is a 58 year old white male who has had a complicated history over the past year related to his rheumatoid arthritis. Reference is made to his previous history and physical examination reports from two recent admissions. To summarize, over the past year he has had increasing amounts of swelling, diffusely in the left wrist and hand. He had localized flexor tenosynovitis causing secondary carpal tunnel compression and approximately two months ago, he underwent an extensive flexor tenosynovectomy and carpal tunnel decompression.
A Dr. J. Speiser evaluated Dickson during this hospitalization and in a 5-13-93 consultation
report included the following in the history of illness section:This is a 58 year old white male who states that he developed a rash on his face and hands about 2-1/2 years ago. At about the same time his joints began getting stiff and tight. He did not really have that much swelling, but it did interfere with his work. He saw Dr. Auclair and was diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis. Over the last 2-1/2 years, the patient has been treated with Prednisone 5 to 10 mg per day. He states that he has only been tried on 1 anti-inflammatory drug and that was Lodine….. When he tried the anti-inflammatory drug Lodine, it was not effective.
Dr. Speiser included in his written impression that Dickson had never been treated with disease modifying drugs for his rheumatoid arthritis. The only thing he has really taken over the last 2-1/2 years is low dose Prednisone 5 to 10 mg a day, which is in itself causing side effects. A Dr. Ronald King began treating Dickson following a 5-14-93 consultation while Dickson was in the hospital. In a 5-14-93 consultation report, Dr. King included in the history of present illness the following:
I was asked to see and evaluate this 58 year old male with rheumatoid arthritis, who now has a septic joint involving the left wrist. This is seen currently, three months after carpal tunnel surgery on this same side.
Mr. Dickson has had recent onset of rheumatoid arthritis over the last two years, presenting acutely with a rash and poly-arthralgia/polyarthritis. He apparently developed carpal tunnel symptoms, disproportionately on the left side compared to the right and underwent carpal tunnel release in February, 1993.
The treatment records, it is found, consistently reflect the diagnosis for Dickson’s condition as rheumatoid arthritis. The treatment records reflect that Dickson had longstanding rheumatoid arthritis with increasing problems of increasing amounts of swelling, pain and numbness involving both hands. It was noted that on the right side he had only minimal difficulty, but on the left side he became aware of marked swelling over the volar aspect of the hand and wrist with some crepitation as well as pain, decreased strength and decreased flexibility of his fingers, with increasing amounts of numbness and tingling involving primarily the index, long and ring fingers. Clinically, it was noted in the treatment records, "he has marked flexor tenosynovitis, beginning just proximal to the carpal tunnel on the left side and extending into the palm of the hand. There is significant swelling extending along the course of the flexor tendons to the left small finger, with crepitation on flexion and extension. He also has physical findings consistent with median nerve compression". The treatment records consistently stated that Dickson had extensive left flexor tenosynovitis causing secondary median nerve compression. The treatment records reflect that some arthritic changes in various of Dickson’s joints were noted by a doctor as early as September of 1988 at which time Dickson was put on anti-arthritic medication. In May of 1991, symptoms of swelling in the hands, some swelling in the knees, and weakness in the shoulder and thighs was noted, and Dickson was referred to a Rheumatologist. The Rheumatologist, Dr. Auclair, in a June 10, 1991 letter discussed Dickson’s symptoms dating back for 2 ½ years, that Dickson had developed swelling, stiffness and limitations of motion of the hands approximately 2 ½ months earlier. Dr. Auclair’s diagnosis in June, 1991 included: suspected arthritis, and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome probably related to the suspected arthritis. There was acknowledgement in Dr. Auclair’s 8-21-91 treatment entry that Dickson "used his hands quite a bit in his work"; the doctor’s opinion, however, remained at that time and subsequently that Dickson has rheumatoid arthritis with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome probably related to the suspected arthritis. Dr. Morrow examined the claimant and testified on the claimant’s behalf, and stated an opinion that the initial left carpal tunnel condition along with extensive flexor tenosynovectomy including the palm to the small finger with debridement of fat necrosis of the left wrist reference the median nerve compression of the left wrist (carpal tunnel syndrome) was the result of the "injury of 10-21-92 associated with (Dickson’s) repetitive use of his left hand at his place of employment in the nature of his work". It is found that the substantial weight of the treatment records in evidence which were part of the basis upon which Dr. Morrow stated he relied in reaching his conclusions do not support Dr. Morrow’s opinion that Dickson’s left carpal tunnel syndrome was causally connected to the work he performed at ABB Combustion Engineering. As there is no evidence of probative force to be substantial evidence establishing a causal connection between the claimant’s work at ABB Combustion Engineering and his left carpal tunnel syndrome, it is found that the claimant has failed to establish that he suffered a compensable occupational disease and thus has not met one of the requirements for liability against the Second Injury Fund. Compensation is therefore denied. All remaining issues are moot.
Date: 10/04/99 Made by: /s/ LESLIE E. H. BROWN
LESLIE E. H. BROWN
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Workers' Compensation
A true copy: Attest:
/s/ Jo Ann Karll
Jo Ann Karll
Director
Division of Workers' Compensation